完善我国留置权制度的建议
完善我国留置权制度的建议 完善我国留置权制度的建议 Suggestions on the Improvement of Lien System 作 者: 孙鹏 作者简介: 孙鹏,西南政法高校 民商法学院,重庆 401120 孙鹏(1971- ),男,四川岳池人,西南政法高校民商法学院教授,博士生导师,法学博士。 原文出处: 《现代法学》(重庆)2017 年第 20176 期 第 34-47 页 内容提要: 留置权仅担保承揽、运输、保管、行纪等法律规定的合同债权以及无因管理人、遗失物拾得人的费用偿还恳求权。 债务人因履行对第三人之义务而将其占有之动产交付债权人,债权人可干脆对第三人动产行使留置权;债权人占有动产非因债务人履行对第三人之义务,只能类推善意取得之法理成立留置权。 商事留置权中债权与动产应属于相互持续性经营关系,可不受不与债权人义务相抵触规则和比例原则之限制,但不得对第三人动产行使商事留置权。 The right of lien only guarantees the contractual rights stipulated in the law,such as contracts for work,transportation,storage and brokerage,and the rights of voluntary servers and lost property pickers to claim for expenses repay.If The debtor deliver movable property in occupation of his own to the creditor for obligation perance of a third party,the creditor can rcise the right of lien on the third party’s movable property directly; if the creditor possesses movable property not for the reason above,he can only gain the right of lien analogizing the bona fide acquisition.Because the creditor’s rights and the movable property in a commercial lien belong to a continuing business relationship,it may not be restricted by the rule of no collision with the debtor’ s duty and the principle of proportion,but the right of the commercial lien can not be applied to a third party. 期刊名称: 《民商法学》 复印期号: 2018 年 04 期 关 键 词: 留置权适用范围/商事留置权/立法建议/application range of the lien right/the right of commercial lien/legislation suggestions 丨图分类号: DF521 文献标记码: A 文章编号: 1001-2397(2017)06-0034-14 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2017.06.04 抵押权、质押权、留置权三类传统担保物权丨,无论立法重规度戒理论关注度,留置权均难不前事者比肩。 各国立法形式上的留置权本存在重大巩异,力图对留置权迕行统一建构,加剧了留置权立法乊混沌不理论乊迷. 3 / 3